Sponsored by HEARTS, 美华文学, and 硅谷女性

Home / Opinion / Debate on Gun Control

Debate on Gun Control

By Vincent Huang

After the tragic incident that occured in Parkland, Florida, many people, as well as the federal government, reignited the gun control debate.

There are many pros and cons for tighter gun control. One point made to support the gun control is that, with stricter gun control laws, the number of deaths would decrease. According to a recent study published by ProsCon.org in 2016, “implementing federal universal background checks could reduce firearm deaths by a projected 56.9%; background checks for ammunition purchases could reduce deaths by a projected 80.7%; and gun identification requirements could reduce deaths by a projected 82.5%” (ProsCon.org). There are also studies that support that guns are rarely used for self-defense. Instead, guns are much more commonly used for suicides and homicides. Having tighter control of guns can help build a much more peaceful society with fewer gun shot tragedies and an overall safer environment.

On the other hand, there are other studies suggesting that gun control laws do not deter crime. A On the other hand, there are other studies suggesting that gun control laws do not deter crime. A study found that “assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level, and that those states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murders” (ProsCon.org).  In many other countries where guns are banned, stabbings increased and the usage of other non-gun weapons increased accordingly. Along with this, gun control laws will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns from illegal providers. From a research done on mass shooting incidents that occured in the U.S., out of the “143 guns [that] were possessed by the killers [only] about 75% [were] obtained legally” (ProsCon.org). Criminal will still be able to get their guns illegally, so severely restricting or banning guns won’t have as much of an effect as people perceive. Along with this, if people agree with the government to ban guns, not only are the people losing out the sacred individual right granted by the Second Amendment, which existed as the nation was formed, but also giving the government more power can possibly lead to a tyranny.

Because of this hard balance between the benefits and costs of gun control, the government doesn’t seem to be able to make any decisions and execute. From the present standpoint, many assault weapon bans and stricter background checks have been turned down, along with a proposal to arm teachers. Let us pray that the 17 children that died in Florida didn’t die in vain.

“Gun Control – ProCon.Org.” Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted in the United States?,  gun-control.procon.org/.

Grinberg, Emanuella, et al. “Fight for stricter gun laws in Florida makes small steps forward.” CNN, Cable News Network, 27 Feb. 2018, www.cnn.com/2018/02/27/us/florida-school-shooting/index.html.

Check Also

Abolish the Capital Gains Tax

Serena Mao The capital gains tax in America is a tax on, well, capital gains: …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *